Good morning. The game of chicken continues in Iran with competing claims heightening the drama. On the one hand, CNBC reports the President’s claim that the “… blockade would cause Iran’s oil industry to ‘explode’ this week,” while the same report provides analyst assessment that “Iran has enough oil storage to buy it at least a month and maybe longer.” It appears that something has to give … and under concern oil prices will continue to rise as the blockade continues, some feel the U.S. might be forced into more aggressive action than has been seen so far in the attempt to close this chapter. While this has more greatly affected other economies, the U.S. economic engine appears to be chugging along … but possibly slowing … as GDP growth was positive, but trailed consensus, and core inflation showed a 12-month rate of 3.2% … well above the claimed Fed target of 2%. Meanwhile, the Fed will likely be under new leadership in a few weeks … but the new chair (Kevin Warsh) will not have an easy time of it as present-chair Powell will remain as a governor, to finish out his term, and there is growing dissent already in the ranks … as the vote this week (one voting to cut and three not agreeing with the “easing” language) showed the highest number of disagreements since 1992. And how are investors behaving at the moment? While AI-related stocks are choppy (with Meta taking a hit due to concerns over AI overspending), all three major indexes are positive just before the noon hour. On a final note for today, I found comments by Jamie Dimon interesting (per last article below) as he warns that comfort with the bond markets might be misguided and suggests that a bond crisis might take place at some time, though does not appear imminent. What he pointed to was how quickly the UK gilt market (their equivalent of our treasuries) deteriorated in 2022, and a sharp spike in rates required the Bank of England to quickly intervene … for, in our case, we would count on the Fed. He is not saying it will certainly happen here … but it could … as there are some similarities in structure between the gilt and U.S. treasuries … and he just wants us to realize this. I guess you could call it gilt by association. Have a great day, Joseph G. Witthohn, CFA Have any questions? Please contact info@teamemerald.com
|

You are now leaving www.teamemerald.com. Follow the link to learn more about the F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF
https://www.emeraldetfs.com/33rd-annual-groundhog-day-exploring-life-sciences-2/ ➜